KLI Colloquia are invited research talks of about an hour followed by 30 min discussion. The talks are held in English, open to the public, and offered in hybrid format.
Spring 2026 KLI Colloquium Series
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/5881861923?omn=85945744831
Meeting ID: 588 186 1923
12 March 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
What Is Biological Modality, and What Has It Got to Do With Psychology?
Carrie Figdor (University of Iowa)
26 March 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
The Science of an Evolutionary Transition in Humans
Tim Waring (University of Maine)
9 April 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Hierarchies and Power in Primatology and Their Populist Appropriation
Rebekka Hufendiek (Ulm University)
16 April 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
A Metaphysics for Dialectical Biology
Denis Walsh (University of Toronto)
30 April 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
What's in a Trait? Reconceptualizing Neurodevelopmental Timing by Seizing Insights From Philosophy
Isabella Sarto-Jackson (KLI)
7 May 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
The Evolutionary Trajectory of Human Hippocampal-Cortical Interactions
Daniel Reznik (Max Planck Society)
21 May 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Why Directionality Emerged in Multicellular Differentiation
Somya Mani (KLI)
28 May 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
The Interplay of Tissue Mechanics and Gene Regulatory Networks in the Evolution of Morphogenesis
James DiFrisco (Francis Crick Institute)
11 June 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Brave Genomes: Genome Plasticity in the Face of Environmental Challenge
Silvia Bulgheresi (University of Vienna)
25 June 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Anne LeMaitre (KLI)
KLI Colloquia 2014 – 2026
Event Details
Topic description / abstract:
Multi-Cultural societies remain stable through time, even when there is conspicuous interaction amongst individuals of the different constituting cultures. The dynamics leading to this outcome necessarily involve individual choice to facilitate or prevent full cultural blend or to remain differentiated, in what we call a multi-culture. Although there are several theories of cultural evolution and change, these do not fully account for multi-cultural stability.
I present computational models based on Language Games (Wittgenstein) that describe the fate and stability of populations that remain segregated. In this model, a cultural trait is a feature that is horizontally transmitted by an agent, and which the other agent learns but idiosyncratically decides to further transmit or not.
In other words, there is individual choice amongst possible alternative cultural traits regarding what trait to spread in further interaction. Said choice is based on learning processes that are unique to the individuals and which assign preferential rewards to prior knowledge (e.g. cultural bias) agains to the new knowledge. (In classic naming games this reward is symmetric, i.e. the same rate of Hebbian reward applies to any choice. This asymmetric reward system is at the core of what allows two (or potentially more) cultures to blend or to remain separated.
A general result of this model is that cultures (or at least specific traits of these) either blend or remain separated. In other words, there is no continuous degree of mixability in a population, even if preferences are distributed heterogeneously.
Biographical note:
Harold P. de Vladar is a theoretical evolutionary biologist with experience in different sub-fields that include population and quantitative genetics, evolution of complexity, origins of life and others. Lately he has been developing cognitive frameworks to understand aspects of cultural change and their relationship to evolution. He also applies the ideas to understand cognition in terms of evolutionary processes implemented in brains through synaptic plasticity, in what is known as Neuronal Replicators.
Harold obtained his PhD from Groningen University (2009) and has been postdoc and researcher in IST Austria, Parmenides Foundation, the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and other European institutions. He is currently a Senior Fellow at the Konrad Lorenz Institute where he is developing his ideas of cultural dynamics and evolution.

